Changes between Version 5 and Version 6 of GuarDyan_VarRedu


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Feb 13, 2018, 4:27:02 PM (7 years ago)
Author:
dieda
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • GuarDyan_VarRedu

    v5 v6  
    4848The efficiency loss was experienced in case of isotopes with high probability for fission around the starting energy. When the starting energy is low, neutrons released in fission take on much higher velocity than starters, thus leaking out of the system very fast. As a result, significant part of computational effort was spent on a few neutrons bouncing around in the system. Population drop caused vectorization gain to be cancelled due to the computational overhead of event-based tracking (particles need to be sorted by event type). On higher starting energies, no considerable speedup was observed in case of elements with low atomic numbers, the improvement from vectorization was more expressed when heavy elements were present. This is due to that the outgoing energy and angle of a neutron scattered on a light isotope are derived by simple laws of collision mechanics, while more complicated energy laws are applied when heavier isotopes are present . In GUARDYAN beside elastic scatter only ACE law 3 (inelastic discrete-level scattering) was used in the former case, and ACE law 4 (and 44) was additionally used in the latter. ACE law 4 represents a continuous tabular distribution, the outgoing energy is given as a probability distribution for every incoming energy. This sampling procedure takes considerably more time, contributing to thread divergence, and resulting in substantial efficiency boost for event-based tracking.
    4949
     50=== Event based and History based approach comparison, Test Case '''2''': simple subcritical assembly
     51
     52The second test case was the verification subcritical model (see [wiki:GuarDyan_PhysModel Modelling and Verification section]) was a 30 cm radius water sphere with 61 UO,,2,, cylindrical fuel rods of 40 cm length, 1 cm radius spaced 1 cm apart from each other see Fig. 1.. Uranium was 4.7% enriched and fuel rod density was taken as 10.5g/cm^3^.
     53
     54[[Image(UOH2O_geometry.png​, 800px, title=Geometry of the subcritical verification model)]] \\ ''Figure 1.: Geometry of the subcritical verification model''
     55
    5056
    5157